2000 Mules Official Website: In May, major films like Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and Top Gun: Maverick is sure to generate a lot of buzzes. Nonetheless, over the month, documentary viewers are expected to turn their focus to a number of lesser-known films. This year, Netflix has already published Documentaries including The Tinder Swindler and Conversations with a Killer: The John Wayne Gacy Tapes.
CAN I SEE 2,000 MULES RUNNING SOMEWHERE?
The official website for 2000 Mules, which opened in over 270 US theatres on Monday, May 2nd, 2022, has showtimes for your location. You’re in luck if you can’t wait to see the movie in theatres but would rather watch it at home. The film will have a “virtual debut” on May 7th, 2022, and you may monitor its progress here. The internet premiere begins at 8 p.m. and tickets start at $20. Instead, you can reserve a copy of the DVD for $24.99 in advance, and it will be mailed to customers on May 8, 2022. Dinesh Joseph D’Souza, author, director, and New York Times bestselling book returns with his latest effort.
People have recently become interested in a documentary about the 2020 presidential election. You now know where to look for 2000 Mules on the internet. According to experts, assumptions and anonymous claims are based on wrong assumptions and improper analysis of cellphone location data, which is insufficient to prove that someone voted in dropbox. Dinesh D’Souza, a conservative filmmaker, developed the movie using information from the Texas-based charity True the Vote, which has spent months convincing states to use its findings to change voting rules. At the time, neither party responded to a request for a statement.
Is the documentary available on Netflix?
2000 Mules is currently unavailable on Netflix, and no intentions to release it have been announced. Regardless, the picture will be available on streaming, in theatres, and on DVD in May. The official website contains additional information. Donald Trump has commented on the film and his own feelings about it. In the interest of full disclosure, HITC disavows all of the film’s speculative assertions and theories. Those who prefer to see the film on their own, however, have our full support.
The 2020 presidential election will be marred by widespread, coordinated voting fraud, according to a documentary by Dinesh D’Souza. To buttress their claims, “2000 Mules” uses tracking and video data from the election integrity organization True the Vote. A tracking database of more than 10 trillion mobile phone pings exposes a sophisticated network of professional operators known as mules moving false and illegal ballots to mail-in dropboxes in the five important states where the election was decided. Video evidence acquired from state-installed surveillance cameras backs up the tracking information. The film concludes with an examination of various strategies to prevent fraud from occurring again.
The film “2000 Mules,” which alleges voter fraud, has been fact-checked
A film premiering at over 270 theatres throughout the United States this week challenges the results of the 2020 presidential election almost 18 months after it ended, based on a faulty analysis of cellphone location data and vote dropbox security footage. The film “2000 Mules,” which ex-presidential candidate Donald Trump praised for showing “amazing election fraud,” offers an unsettling picture of Democrat-aligned vote “mules” apparently being paid to unlawfully collect and deliver ballots in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
The following are the Specifics
At least 2,000 “mules” were allegedly hired to illegally collect and distribute ballots to drop boxes in key states ahead of the 2020 presidential election, according to claims. True, the facts show that the vote did not prove this. Experts argue these conclusions are based on faulty assumptions about the integrity of cellphone monitoring data and reasons why voters would vote several times. Ballot harvesting is a derogatory word for dropping off completed ballots for someone other than yourself.
The practice is legal in some countries, such as those targeted by True the Vote, but it is illegal for the majority of individuals, with the exception of family members, housemates, and people with disabilities. True According to the Vote, an anonymous cellphone geolocation data buy for $2 million identified 2,000 ballot harvesters in five states. These details are the “pings” that track a person’s location based on their app usage. Then, before the 2020 election, it used a virtual barrier to detect cellphones that frequently passed near ballot drop boxes in a county and many nameless NGOs. True the Vote assumed the owner of a smartphone was a “mule” between October 1 and Election Day, a word for someone engaging in an illegal ballot gathering plot with a nonprofit.
Only one unidentified whistleblower from San Luis, Arizona, appears to be able to confirm the group’s claims of a paid ballot harvesting system in the video, based on what she “assumed” to be ballot collection payments. The film makes no mention of other states in 2020. Experts argue that even at its most advanced, mobile phone location data can only reliably track a smartphone within a few meters—not close enough to tell if someone dropped off a ballot or simply walked or drove nearby.”
“You might use cellular evidence to say this guy was in that area,” said Aaron Striegel, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Notre Dame. “But to claim they were at the voting box, you’re stretching it a lot.” “There’s usually a considerable degree of ambiguity” when it comes to this.
Legitimate reasons for someone to be in both a nonprofit’s office
Furthermore, ballot drop boxes are usually placed in high-traffic areas such as college campuses, libraries, government buildings, and apartment complexes, increasing the likelihood of innocent people being caught in the group’s net. There are legitimate reasons for someone to be in both a nonprofit’s office and one of those popular spots. Delivery persons, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers, and political officials are all familiar with nonprofit drop boxes and drop boxes.
True the Vote claims that it weeded out people who had a “pattern of living” that included frequenting nonprofit and drop-off places before election season. This technique would not filter out election workers who spend more time at drop boxes during election season, cab drivers whose normal routes don’t follow a pattern, or those who just changed their everyday habits. To back up their claims, True the Vote used security footage of persons placing multiple votes into drop boxes in various jurisdictions. Because the telephones of voters were tracked anonymously, it was impossible to tell if they were the same people.
Because most states allow residents to vote for family members and housemates, an online video of a voter putting a stack of votes on a dropbox is insufficient evidence to show any crime. According to the Associated Press, Larry Campbell, a Michigan voter who was not shown in the film, cast six ballots in a neighborhood dropbox in 2020 for himself, his wife, and his four adult children. Brad Raffensperger’s office investigated one of True the Vote’s CCTV cameras and discovered that the individual was dropping off ballots for himself and his family.