Star Trek Creator Gene Roddenberrys Vision Explained

Gene Roddenberry’s original vision for Star Trek continues to define the franchise almost 60 years after the premiere of The Original Series. 30 years after Gene Roddenberry’s death, new Star Trek TV shows are often criticized for straying from his original vision. However, what these critics often forget is that Gene Roddenberry’s opinions about what constituted “proper” Star Trek could turn on a dime. So, rather than ask whether modern Star Trek shows live up to Gene’s vision, we should really ask which version of Gene’s vision that the modern era is supposed to be following.

Looking through the writers’ bibles for both Star Trek: The Original Series and Star Trek: The Next Generation, it’s clear that Gene Roddenberry’s vision for the future drastically changed in the intervening decades between TOS and TNG. Gene Roddenberry’s rules for TNG could be so restrictive for the show’s writers that they were dubbed “Roddenberry’s Box”. TNG‘s supposed “no conflict” rule even appeared to contradict his original Star Trek Is pitch document from the 1960s. Despite these contradictions, Gene Roddenberry’s optimistic vision for the future of humanity shines through in both shows, and continues to define Star Trek to this day.

Gene Roddenberry’s Original 1960s Vision For Star Trek

“Star Trek offers an almost infinite number of exciting science fiction stories…”

In 1964, Gene Roddenberry put together a pitch document for a brand-new science fiction series entitled Star Trek. Roddenberry had grown frustrated with the increasing censorship of network television, which made it difficult to discuss the social and political turmoil that defined America in the 1960s. The Fifty-Year Mission: The First 25 Years: The Complete, Uncensored, Unauthorized Oral History of Star Trek by Edward Gross and Mark A. Altman quotes Roddenberry, as he explains how Star Trek was devised as a vehicle for that kind of commentary:

“It seemed to me that perhaps if I wanted to talk about sex, religion, politics, make some comments against Vietnam, and so on, that if I had similar situations involving these subjects happening on other planets to little green people, indeed it might get by, and it did. It apparently went right over the censors’ heads, but all the fourteen-year-olds in our audience knew exactly what we were talking about.”

Reading Gene Roddenberry’s 1964 pitch document reflects this intention, as he is keen to emphasize “Parallel Worlds” as Star Trek‘s unique selling point. Pitching Star Trek as a means to appeal to a wider audience than dyed-in-the-wool science fiction fans, Roddenberry believed that recognizable settings would appeal to the average viewer, while keeping the costs down for the studio. What it also allowed Roddenberry to do was comment on hot topics like the Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War, as this quote subtly infers:

“…our stories deal with plant and animal life, plus people, quite similar to that on Earth. Social evolution will also have interesting points of similarity with ours. There will be differences, of course, ranging from the subtle to the boldly dramatic, out of which comes much of our color and excitement.”

In Star Trek as Gene Roddenberry saw it, Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner) and the crew of the USS Enterprise would visit worlds that were experiencing problems either allegorically or literally related to the real-world concerns of 1960s America. Through the optimistic portrayal of Kirk and his multicultural, ethnically diverse crew, viewers at home could be inspired to strive for a better future. That overall message, presenting a utopian view of humanity, will always define Star Trek, even if the nuances of it have shifted slightly over the years in line with the changing TV landscape.

Related

Roddenberry’s Lost TV Pitch 7 Years Before Creating Star Trek Uncovered

7 years before creating Star Trek, Gene Roddenberry wanted to create a TV show about Sam Houston. Here is his pitch from the Roddenberry Archives.

Gene Roddenberry’s Vision Changed For Star Trek: The Next Generation

The 1987 writer and directors guide for Star Trek: The Next Generation specifically outlines “What Has Not Changed” and “What Has Changed” when it comes to Star Trek: The Original Series. The TNG guide is keen to emphasize the importance of the crew, ascribing the success of TOS to its ensemble cast led by William Shatner. The 1987 writers and directors’ guide also emphasizes that, like Star Trek: The Original Series before it, TNG will tell entertaining and believable sci-fi stories that comment on the issues facing contemporary America.

”
…we invite writers to consider premises involving challenges facing humanity today (the 1980s and 1990s) particularly those which interest the writer personally.
”

The writers and directors’ guide to Star Trek: The Next Generation also highlights the differences made to the TNG version of the starship Enterprise. The 1967 writers and directors’ guide for TOS described Kirk’s Enterprise and Starfleet in general as being “only semi-military in practice — omitting features which are heavily authoritarian.” A century later, these militaristic aspects are relaxed even further, as the USS Enterprise-D has families aboard as well as a ship’s counselor, Deanna Troi (Marina Sirtis) who is of “vital importance” to the “the success of a starship’s mission“.

1:47

Related

Roddenberry’s Bizarre, “Cheesecake” Idea For Star Trek: TNG’s Troi Confirmed By Patrick Stewart

Patrick Stewart confirms an old Star Trek: The Next Generation rumor about a bizarre idea Gene Roddenberry had for Counselor Troi in his new memoir.

An increased focus on psychology is where the oft-repeated Roddenberry rule about interpersonal conflict comes into play. According to Star Trek: TNG luminaries like Rick Berman and Ronald D. Moore, Gene Roddenberry did not want any conflict between the lead characters, which often left the writers creatively hamstrung. This rule isn’t explicitly referenced in the TNG writers and directors’ guide. However, there’s a reference to the crew of the USS Enterprise-D being:

“…intelligent, witty, thoughtful, compassionate, caring human beings – but they have human faults and weaknesses too – although not as many or as severe as in our time. They have been selected for this mission because of their ability to transcend their human failings.”

This ability to transcend “human failings” is presumably why Gene Roddenberry hated Picard’s family storyline in Star Trek: The Next Generation season 4, for example. However, rather than suggesting Roddenberry wanted no conflict, the writers’ guide instead implies that there should be no conflict for conflict’s sake. Scripts that would not be considered for TNG include “melodrama” and “stories that involve our characters doing something stupid or dangerous” like betraying their crew “because they have fallen in love with a beautiful pirate princess“.

Fundamentally, Gene Roddenberry envisioned a future free of poverty, injustice, and hunger, freeing humanity to explore something greater than themselves, while teaching viewers something along the way. Despite Gene Roddenberry’s squeamishness about conflict, and his vision of a 24th century that prides itself on improving personal wellbeing, the original Star Trek ideals from 1964 are at the very core of The Next Generation. 20 years later, Star Trek was still about the best of humanity presenting potential solutions to the difficulties that face the show’s contemporary audiences. But does Star Trek still follow that blueprint 27 years after TNG first aired?

Related

William Shatner Said New Star Trek Would Make Roddenberry “Turn In His Grave” – What He Meant

William Shatner clarifies a statement he made in 2022 that Gene Roddenberry wouldn’t approve of the current Star Trek on Paramount+ shows.

Does Star Trek Still Honor Gene Roddenberry’s Vision Today?

It was Star Trek: Deep Space Nine that was first accused of dishonoring Gene Roddenberry’s original vision. Nobody will ever know if Gene Roddenberry would hate DS9 had he lived to see it, but the controversy was patient zero for the arguments that define modern Star Trek discourse. Star Trek: Picard was controversial because it depicted a corrupt and self-interested Federation, but Admiral Picard rejects this, because he, and we, believe Starfleet can do much better.

Years earlier, Star Trek: Discovery was accused of betraying Roddenberry’s vision because it was too violent, but beneath the gore, there was still a story about humanity striving for something better. Discovery season 1’s Klingon War is never presented as anything other than brutal and unnecessary, and crucially, Commander Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green) is fighting to end the war, not win it. Television has changed, and so, obviously, Star Trek has to change with the times, but it’s proved time and again that it doesn’t have to sacrifice Roddenberry’s vision to do so.

Despite their surface level violence, bad language, or irreverent humor, every single modern Star Trek show retains the core ideals of optimism of Roddenberry’s original vision to tell stories about the world today. Almost 60 years on, in increasingly polarized times, Gene Roddenberry’s vision of a future that’s free of poverty, hunger, and racism is still a shining beacon of hope. And in their own ways, each of the modern Star Trek shows continues to keep that flame alive.

• 

• 

  Star Trek: The Next Generation

  Writers

  Rick Berman , Michael Piller , Brannon Braga , Jeri Taylor , Ronald D. Moore

  Showrunner

  Rick Berman , Michael Piller , Jeri Taylor