SERAP Urges Governors To Account For Security Votes

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on all 36 state governors in Nigeria to provide a detailed account of how public funds allocated as security votes have been spent since May 29, 2023.

The organisation made this call through Freedom of Information (FoI) requests sent to each governor.

SERAP also requested that the governors invite the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to jointly investigate, track, and monitor the use of these funds.

In the FoI requests dated June 28, 2025, and signed by SERAP deputy director Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation stressed the urgency of transparency in the wake of recent violent incidents in Benue State and the widespread insecurity affecting many parts of the country.

SERAP warned that the rising insecurity continues to severely affect socially and economically vulnerable Nigerians, contributing to increased poverty, hunger, and serious human rights abuses.

The organisation maintained that the Nigerian Constitution does not support the secretive spending of public funds under the guise of security votes.

The FoI requests, read in part: โ€œDespite the billions of naira yearly budgeted as security votes, many governors are grossly failing to guarantee and ensure the security and welfare of the people in their states, contrary to section 14(2)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution.โ€

โ€œThe obligations of state governors to guarantee and ensure the security and welfare of the Nigerian people is interlinked with their responsibility under section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution to โ€˜abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of officeโ€™.โ€

โ€œThe Nigerian Constitution imposes a fundamental obligation on governors to account for and explain to Nigerians how they spend security votes.โ€

โ€œIn 2021 alone, state governors and local government chairmen in the 36 states reportedly collected over N375 billion from the public treasury in the name of security votes.โ€

โ€œNigerians have the right to know how your state is spending the public funds budgeted as security votes to guarantee and ensure the security of life and property of Nigerians resident in your state.โ€

โ€œWhile SERAP understands that authorities may keep certain matters of operational secrets from the people in the name of national security, there is no constitutional or legal basis to hide basic information on public spending from the people.โ€

โ€œWe would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within 7 days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall consider appropriate legal actions to compel your state to comply with our requests in the public interest.โ€

โ€œSERAP notes that the Supreme Court in a groundbreaking judgment declared that the Freedom of Information Act โ€˜is applicable and applies to the public records in the Federationโ€™, including those kept by your state.โ€

โ€œWith the landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has made clear that state governors can no longer hide under their unfounded claim that the Freedom of Information Act does not apply to them.โ€

โ€œAs the Supreme Court has eloquently stated, any freedom of information law by the state is subject to the Freedom of Information Act.โ€

โ€œAny failure to account for the spending of security votes by your state will amount to a blatant disregard of the Supreme Court judgment which has effectively ended the claims by governors that the Freedom of Information Act does not apply to how they spend public funds including security votes.โ€

โ€œThe judgment sends a powerful message that state governors can no longer escape accountability for how they spend security votes. SERAP urges you to promptly uphold the judgment by accounting for how your state is spending security votes.โ€

โ€œThe Supreme Court has pointed the way for governors to show transparency and accountability in the spending of security votes.โ€

โ€œDisclosing details of spending public funds as security votes by your state would serve to engage the Nigerian people in an honest conversation about the security problems in several states and what the governors are doing to respond to them.โ€

โ€œThe intense secrecy and lack of meaningful oversight of the spending of security votes by governors have for many years contributed to large-scale stealing of public funds.โ€

โ€œYears of secrecy in the spending of security votes have also limited the ability of the people to hold high-ranking public officials to account for their constitutional responsibility to ensure the security and welfare of the people.โ€

โ€œThe failure by state governors to disclose and account for the spending of security votes is a grave violation of the public trust and the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, national anticorruption laws, and the countryโ€™s international human rights and anticorruption obligations.โ€

โ€œPervasive tendency by governors to regard or treat security votes as their personal entitlement or funds is antithetical to the Nigerian Constitution and international standards. Security votes should be used for improving the security situation in the states or returned to the public treasury.โ€

โ€œSection 14(2)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution provides that โ€˜the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.โ€™ Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires your state to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power.โ€

โ€œSection 13 of the Nigerian Constitution further imposes clear responsibility on your state to conform to, observe and apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of the constitution.โ€

โ€œThe public interest in publishing the information sought outweighs any considerations to withhold the information.โ€

โ€œAccording to our information, the World Bank last week classified Nigeria as โ€˜economy in fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCS)โ€™, which explains why the country continues to face severe and persistent development challenges.โ€

โ€œOther 38 countries classified as FCS alongside Nigeria include Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Libya, Mali, and Sudan. The World Bank noted that insecurity is contributing to extreme poverty in Nigeria.โ€

โ€œAccording to the Bank, โ€˜the outlook for poverty in Nigeria is sobering. Millions of people are currently experiencing acute food insecurity. Severe gaps in education and health undermine human development in the country.โ€™โ€